Greetings,

You put forward erroneous information, that is refuted by empirical
data, as fact and then claim foul and charge someone is endeavoring to
play word games when they point this out? This is an old tactic for you
and one that you seem to visit repeatedly. It has seldom worked in the
past. It will not work here either.

Kalodan's reply was directed to your statement that most of the Basin
consider Wyrd to not be Taint. As empircial data proves the opposite and
that Wyrd is merely Taint in a different color and one less letter in
it's name I fail to see why you are complaining. The fact that I would
view any poll that you conducted, without strict, arduous oversight, to
be slanted and skewed I also have grave doubts you have talked to 'most'
of the Basin when you make the statement: '....and though many, or even
most, believe Wyrd does not equate to Taint...'

The point of your post is to proselytize the wonders and virtues of
Deepnight in order to solicit more to reside within and/or give funds.
The fact is that you hawk the virtues of Deepnight in your first
paragraph with a statement that is false and try to give weight to that
statement with a vague generalization with no data and no proof of that
statement besides yourself.

Show the data to make such a sweeping theorem and claim it as fact. Show
the empirical data to prove that Wyrd is not Taint. Show the data that
'most' of the Basin do not consider Wyrd to be Taint tied up in a pretty
bow. Otherwise your attempt to sidetrack and obfuscate that you have
been caught claiming an unproven unsubstantiated ludicrous blanket
statement is transparent. I will admit it is amusing. Ridiculously
transparent but amusing.

Blessed be
Sorcerer of Moonlit Verdure, Xiphoid Caelicus


Penned by my hand on the 4th of Dvarsh, in the year 177 CE.