I commend you for managing to spin out two points for so long, but they
still fall short
Cities are not natural and never will be
Gib is not, in his current state mad and we did not approach him with
preconceptions

Now I have studied gib for longer than you have been alive
Since before the taint was liberated from the forest of glomdoring
Since before I left the corrupt serenwilde (oh and before you say "its
not corrupt" it was, and from what i can gather in my scholarly ways it
still is)
So don't go saying that i went in trying to prove glomdoring right,
because there wasn't a glomdoring, only the brotherhood of the crow

I follow Raezon, lord of knowledge and it was fear of this knowledge
that had me shunned from your commune in the first place so don't try
and be all high and mighty over technique or presentation of an
impartial assessment
When was the last time you actually spoke to the great stag that guards
your forest? Outside of the context of "do this for me" or "we need you
to do that"

A wise tae'dae once told me that any evidence can be circumvented with
witty argument, but the true proof of a statement is when your enemy can
say nothing but "no, no its not true, no it isn't, no its not cause i
say its not and your a lier."
Whilst this is commonplace amoungst the playing furrikin, one grows to
either disproves with proof rather than accusations or simply submits.

Please present a carefully documented counter theory with signed
witnesses to the board for our reading leisure if you have anything
futher to add to the matter
Until such a time please keep your barbs behind your teeth.
Don't bother posting on this matter until you have submitted your
evidence, I didn't.


And once again - ask miakoda what nature is, and if you are still stuck
for a definition then the board will be more than happy to furnish you
with a definition.

All questions and requests to be addressed to me in person by letter
In service
Warden Raguel Hartfire

Penned by my hand on the 15th of Avechary, in the year 125 CE.